Document processing
Invoices, contracts, delivery notes and forms read, checked and filed. The uncertain ones go to a person; the rest never touch a keyboard.
Typically the fastest payback of anything we build.
We build intelligent assistants, automation and custom software for businesses that want results in weeks — not roadmaps in years.
Free · 20 minutesNo sales deckReply within 1 working day
Free, and the only call before you see something running.
Against your data, measured on cases you recognise.
Integrated, monitored and handed over with a runbook.
Your repository from day one. No lock-in in the contract or the stack.
One working day, from an engineer rather than an inbox.
AI is not reserved for corporations with million-euro budgets. The expensive work is rarely the strategic kind — it is the re-keying, the re-checking and the re-sending that nobody puts on a roadmap because everybody assumes it is unavoidable.
That is where we operate, with solutions that pay for themselves in weeks.
Invoices, contracts, delivery notes and forms read, checked and filed. The uncertain ones go to a person; the rest never touch a keyboard.
Typically the fastest payback of anything we build.
Inbound email and messages classified, routed and answered from your own knowledge — with drafts a human approves until the numbers earn autonomy.
Response times fall before headcount ever needs to rise.
The exports, the re-keying, the second spreadsheet that exists because the first one is wrong. Unglamorous, and quietly the most expensive.
The work nobody puts on a roadmap, and everybody does.
The Monday report rebuilt by hand, the month-end comparison between two systems that never quite agree. Scheduled, diffed and explained.
From half a day of assembly to a notification.
Policies, procedures and product detail scattered across PDFs and inboxes, made answerable — with sources attached so answers can be verified.
Onboarding stops depending on who is available to ask.
Almost none of it is the part that needs a person. Most of a repetitive task is waiting, re-reading and re-typing — which is exactly the part a system can take, leaving the one decision that actually required judgement.
Queueing, reading, re-keying, chasing, filing.
Most engagements start in one of these and spread into the others once the first result lands. You are not asked to choose a package on day one.
The model is a small part of it. Most of the work is the connective tissue on either side — and the branch that sends the uncertain cases to a person instead of guessing.
fig. 02 — reference architecture, simplified
Every output can be traced back to the input and the sources that produced it. If an answer is wrong, you can see why it was wrong — which is the only way it ever gets fixed.
We build the handoff to a person first, then automate the volume around it. Projects that skip this step fail on the cases nobody wrote down.
Retries, idempotency and alerting on every path. A silent automation is worse than a manual process, because nobody notices for three weeks.
Want this drawn for your process instead of ours?
Free, 20 minutes, and you leave with a ranked shortlist either way.
Every engagement runs the same short arc. You can stop after any step and keep what has been built — there is no phase that only makes sense if you buy the next one.
A short call to find where AI has the biggest leverage in your business.
We ask about the work, not the technology: what takes the longest, what gets redone, where the errors show up. Most conversations surface two or three candidates. We tell you which one we would start with and, more usefully, which ones we would not.
A ranked shortlist and an honest read on feasibility.
A working proof of concept, so you decide on evidence rather than promises.
We build the narrow version of the real thing against your actual data. It runs, it can be wrong in ways you can see, and it is measured against cases you recognise. This is where most assumptions — ours included — get corrected cheaply.
Something you can use, plus numbers on how well it works.
Production deployment, integration, and ongoing improvement.
Integration into your systems, access control, monitoring and a rollout your team is prepared for. Then the part most projects skip: watching it in real use, fixing what reality exposes, and widening the scope only once the narrow version has earned it.
A system in production with someone accountable for it.
Not extras, and not a premium tier. These ship with every engagement because a system without them is a prototype someone has been asked to depend on.
You should be able to run, audit, extend or replace us without a negotiation. That is the standard the list below is written against.
Built from your real cases and agreed before launch, so accuracy is a number you can check rather than a claim you have to take on trust — and so we can both tell whether the next change helped.
Standard frameworks, readable structure, in a repository you own from day one.
EU infrastructure with named processors, encrypted in transit and at rest.
Alerting on the paths that matter. A silent failure is worse than a manual process, because nobody notices for three weeks.
Role-based permissions and a log of who saw what, designed at the schema rather than added when the questionnaire arrives.
What it does, how it is deployed, and what to do at 2am. Written for the engineer who inherits it.
The cases that do not fit the rule routed to a person, by design.
Our numbers, not a ticket queue. You message the engineer who built it.
The Regulation is now in general application, and most of what it asks for is engineering: disclosure, oversight, logs, documentation and evidence that the thing works. We build those in by default rather than selling them as a compliance package.
Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 enters into force, with obligations phased in over the following three years.
Banned practices apply, and providers and deployers must ensure staff working with AI have a sufficient level of AI literacy.
Obligations for general-purpose AI models, governance structures and penalties begin to apply.
The bulk of the Regulation applies, including the Article 50 transparency duties that reach ordinary business chatbots and generated content.
In effect nowHigh-risk obligations for AI embedded in regulated products, plus the deadline for general-purpose models placed on the market before August 2025.
Six duties, six things we do about them. None of these is expensive designed in; all of them are expensive retrofitted the week a customer sends you a questionnaire.
Every assistant we ship discloses that it is an AI system in the interface itself, not in a policy page. Synthetic content we generate on your behalf is marked as such.
Confidence thresholds route uncertain cases to a review queue, and every automated action has a person who can reverse it. Oversight is a screen someone actually uses, not a clause.
Inputs, retrieved sources, the decision and who reviewed it are logged with retention rules. If a regulator or a customer asks why, the answer exists.
Where the training or retrieval data came from, what it contains, what was excluded and why — documented while we build, because reconstructing it afterwards is guesswork.
Purpose, architecture, model choices, known limitations and test results, written as we go and handed over with the system.
An evaluation set built from your real cases, agreed before launch and re-run on every change, so claims about accuracy are evidenced.
We are engineers, not lawyers. Classification and sign-off belong with your counsel — our job is to make sure the evidence they ask for already exists.
Befzy was founded by AI engineers who spent years shipping production systems inside organisations where a failed deployment was not an option. We took that standard and pointed it at businesses that were told they were too small for it.
The result is a studio built around one constraint: everything we build has to survive contact with real users, real data and a Tuesday afternoon.
Befzy is engineering-led. The people who scope your work have taken AI from first idea to production themselves. You talk directly to the people building your solution — which is also why we can be honest when the answer is no.
An account manager relays your question to the team.
You talk to the engineer writing the code.
A discovery phase that bills for three months.
A working prototype in days.
A roadmap presentation with a slide called 'AI Vision'.
A shortlist, ranked, with the weak ideas named as weak.
Success measured in deliverables handed over.
Success measured in hours returned to your team.
Data protection reviewed at the end.
GDPR-native architecture from the first schema.
Honest assessments, fast delivery, and technology that adapts to your business — not the other way around.
Meet the studioSomething we have not covered? Ask us directly or mail hello@befzy.com.
A working prototype against your own data usually takes days rather than months, and a first production deployment typically lands in weeks. The variable is rarely the build — it is how quickly we can get access to a representative sample of your data and a decision-maker who can say yes.
Yes. We are based in Germany and work with clients worldwide. Delivery is remote by default, with calls scheduled around your timezone. European hosting and GDPR-aligned processing remain the default regardless of where your business sits, because it is the stricter standard.
We scope in phases so you are never committing to the whole thing up front. The discovery call is free. A prototype is a small fixed-price engagement sized to the use case. Production work is quoted once the prototype has told us what it actually involves — which is the only honest moment to quote it.
We work on the minimum data required, on infrastructure we can name, with processing agreements in place before anything moves. Where a use case allows it we prefer models that can run on European infrastructure. Where a third-party API is genuinely the better tool, we tell you which one, what it receives, and what its retention policy says.
That is usually the majority of the work, and we treat it as the point rather than an afterthought. If a system has an API we integrate against it; if it does not, there is almost always a workable path through exports, database access or the interface itself. We establish this during discovery, before anyone commits.
Then we say so on the call. A meaningful share of the problems people bring us are better solved by a scheduled job, a fixed integration or a corrected process — cheaper to build, cheaper to run and far less likely to surprise you. We would rather build the right small thing than sell the impressive wrong one.
The engineers who founded Befzy. There is no delivery team sitting behind a sales team — the person on your discovery call is the person writing the code and the person you message when something breaks.
A free 20-minute call, no strings attached. We will tell you where the leverage is — and where it is not.